CM punk or Daniel Bryan?
Tough one... CM Punk, simply because he is a) allowed to speak
his mind a lot more and thus able to cut promos that are not only funny
(liek Daniel's) but also really touching and true. b) As much as I like
Bryan, Punk's move set is appealing to me a bit more. c) REally shallow
speaking: Punk looks better. I just really didg guys with tattoos and
piercings.
Thoughts on people who think you're not a real wrestling fan if you don't think Bryan is better?
People think that now? Just because I prefer Punk? Get your
thoughts straight is what I would advise them. Everyone thinks of these
things differently and values certain aspects differently than others.
Your choice in favourite wrestlers does not denote whether you are a
'real' fan or not!
Yeah people think that.
Apparently if you think Punk is better you are just a dumb Punk mark who
doesn't know anything about wrestling.
Well this is just a plain stupid statement! Of course ge gained a
lot followers by joining the WWE and he is one of the most popular
stars around, but that doesn't make any fan of him less a real wrestling
fan than those that e.g. adore Austin Aries!
I wish more wrestling fans were like you, some of them are just flat out rude.
Awww, thank you. :3 Maybe it's because I'm probably older than
the usual twitter folk or because I just feel content enough in my
choices to be able to discuss things instead of bashing people. ^^;
Well most of the flat out
rude and are between 13-16 so you're probably right. They're not all bad
though, it's mostly the ones who think they're 'smarks'
I am not even that familiar with the terminology of 'marks' and
'smarks'. I am just a dedicated fan and I accept everyone's opinion as
long as they manage to utter it politely. The age doesn't really matter
in this. I think one can love e.g. CM Punk whether he or she is 15 or
35!
